BrorasCell0M3G4 2010-06-08 14:10:04

...Wait, WUT?! Aw, DAMN! So the philosopher approach won't work in front of the judge.

Son of a bitch...

domo12233 2010-06-21 14:49:16

&noci0x8024ffnl2.73972602739726nl6.16 438356164384nl-152nl137.272727272727%
dnenoci&drowIGVKPI"FQYPilynpfykjqy"vq "igv"qp"vjg"itqwpfilynpfykCU"HCT"CU"W "MPQYilynpfykKOO0000ilynpfykYKNN["HEM KP"YQPMCilynpfyk@<Q"lwuv"igv"vjtgy"yk vj"kv"@<q">5%dnedrow&rahc25nl14nl36nl 37nl91%dnerahc&ofniyknn{"hemkp"yqpmci lynpfyk<R"k"lwuv"ocfg"vjku"qwv"qh"dqt gfqo"<q%dneofni

my code for replaying :The Game: P.s. LOVED IT >:O

tolerateu 2010-07-17 23:59:36

ummmm....i think i'd prefer a life of sports and booze than to think about the purpose of life. just sayin

Pjorg 2010-08-01 09:20:31

ETERNAL HAPPINESS < NOTHING, and

NOTHING < HAMBURGER, therefore:

ETERNAL HAPPINESS < HAMBURGER. Holy shit!

Jakanddaxter 2010-08-31 00:31:47

Even though this started off as a joke, if you look at it from an economical perspective... In china, The population is limited due to A. Lack of Space, and B. Lack of Jobs. We want to focus on the second one. If there are more humans than there are jobs, then eventually, the cost to raise a human overcomes the economical gain that person creates, thus making him/her worthless as they take money out of the world. The only way they could benefit society is if a certain portion of the world tallied an amount of children to be raised, and an amount to be cannibalized. At this point the creators of these new people would feel utterly horrid at eating their creation, and thus, would eventuially feel worthless.

leobara 2010-09-08 23:15:04

Life has as much value as the person living it, gives to it. Most of the other comments I've seen say something around a human being worthless/priceless/valueless based on society. That is incorrect in my perspective. You cannot base value on a life when you yourself do not live said persons life. It is mere opinion on wether it has worth/value/price. Even though this is a joke, in a serious debate, I do belive I am correct (Not to be full of myself)

webchameleon 2010-09-28 04:39:38

I don't get this. The premise is faulty and every other sentence is just an outrageous claim. It's like an Ayn Rand-wannabe who's gotten confused and is double-speaking.